Association between pregnancy-related complications and development of type 2 diabetes and hypertension in women … – BMC Medicine

Fraser A, Nelson SM, Macdonald-Wallis C, Cherry L, Butler E, Sattar N, et al. Associations of pregnancy complications with calculated cardiovascular disease risk and cardiovascular risk factors in middle age: the avon longitudinal study of parents and children. Circulation. 2012;125(11):136780.

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Rich-Edwards JW, Fraser A, Lawlor DA, Catov JM. Pregnancy characteristics and womens future cardiovascular health: an underused opportunity to improve womens health? Epidemiol Rev. 2014;36(1):5770.

Article PubMed Google Scholar

Sattar N, Greer IA. Pregnancy complications and maternal cardiovascular risk: opportunities for intervention and screening? BMJ. 2002;325(7356):15760.

Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Seely EW, Solomon CG. Insulin resistance and its potential role in pregnancy-induced hypertension. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2003;88(6):23938.

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Bosio PM, McKenna PJ, Conroy R, OHerlihy C. Maternal central hemodynamics in hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 1999;94(6):97884.

CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Redman CW, Sacks GP, Sargent IL. Preeclampsia: an excessive maternal inflammatory response to pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999;180(2):499506.

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Umesawa M, Kobashi G. Epidemiology of hypertensive disorders in pregnancy: prevalence, risk factors, predictors and prognosis. Hypertens Res. 2017;40(3):21320.

Article PubMed Google Scholar

Obstetricians ACo, Gynecologists. Gestational hypertension and preeclampsia: ACOG Practice Bulletin, number 222. Obstet Gynecol. 2020;135(6):e23760.

Article Google Scholar

Behboudi-Gandevani S, Amiri M, Bidhendi Yarandi R, Ramezani TF. The impact of diagnostic criteria for gestational diabetes on its prevalence: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Diabetol Metab Syndr. 2019;11(1):118.

Article Google Scholar

Okoth K, Chandan JS, Marshall T, Thangaratinam S, Thomas GN, Nirantharakumar K, et al. Association between the reproductive health of young women and cardiovascular disease in later life: umbrella review. BMJ (Clinical research ed). 2020;371:m3502.

PubMed Google Scholar

Wilkins-Haug L, Celi A, Thomas A, Frolkis J, Seely EW. Recognition by womens health care providers of long-term cardiovascular disease risk after preeclampsia. Obstet Gynecol. 2015;125(6):128792.

Article PubMed Google Scholar

Young B, Hacker MR, Rana S. Physicians knowledge of future vascular disease in women with preeclampsia. Hypertens Pregnancy. 2012;31(1):508.

Article PubMed Google Scholar

Bellamy L, Casas J-P, Hingorani AD, Williams D. Type 2 diabetes mellitus after gestational diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet (London, England). 2009;373(9677):17739.

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Giorgione V, Ridder A, Kalafat E, Khalil A, Thilaganathan B. Incidence of postpartum hypertension within 2 years of a pregnancy complicated by pre-eclampsia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BJOG. 2021;128(3):495503.

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Pathirana MM, Lassi Z, Ali A, Arstall M, Roberts CT, Andraweera PH. Cardiovascular risk factors in women with previous gestational diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Rev Endocr Metab Disord. 2021;22(4):72961.

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Alonso-Ventura V, Li Y, Pasupuleti V, Roman YM, Hernandez AV, Perez-Lopez FR. Effects of preeclampsia and eclampsia on maternal metabolic and biochemical outcomes in later life: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Metabolism. 2020;102:154012.

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Bellamy L, Casas J-P, Hingorani AD, Williams DJ. Pre-eclampsia and risk of cardiovascular disease and cancer in later life: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2007;335(7627):974.

Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Bellou V, Belbasis L, Tzoulaki I, Evangelou E. Risk factors for type 2 diabetes mellitus: an exposure-wide umbrella review of meta-analyses. PLoS One. 2018;13(3):e0194127.

Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Pittara T, Vyrides A, Lamnisos D, Giannakou K. Pre-eclampsia and long-term health outcomes for mother and infant: an umbrella review. BJOG. 2021;128(9):142130.

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Leslie MS, Briggs LA. Preeclampsia and the risk of future vascular disease and mortality: a review. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2016;61(3):31524.

Article PubMed Google Scholar

Haas DM, Ehrenthal DB, Koch MA, Catov JM, Barnes SE, Facco F, et al. Pregnancy as a window to future cardiovascular health: design and implementation of the nuMoM2b heart health study. Am J Epidemiol. 2016;183(6):51930.

Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Adam S, McIntyre HD, Tsoi KY, Kapur A, Ma RC, Dias S, et al. Pregnancy as an opportunity to prevent type 2 diabetes mellitus: FIGO Best Practice Advice. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2023;160:5667.

Article Google Scholar

Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, Group* P. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151(4):2649.

Article PubMed Google Scholar

Singh M, Crowe F, Thangaratinam S, Abel KM, Black M, Okoth K, et al. Association of pregnancy complications/risk factors with the development of future long-term health conditions in women: overarching protocol for umbrella reviews. BMJ Open. 2022;12(12):e066476.

Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

MuM-PreDiCT Group. Multimorbidity in pregnancy: determinants, clusters, consequences and trajectories. Available from: https://mumpredict.org.Accessed 20 Feb 2023.

Lee E, Dobbins M, DeCorby K, McRae L, Tirilis D, Husson H. An optimal search filter for retrieving systematic reviews and meta-analyses. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2012;12(1):111.

Article Google Scholar

Shea BJ, Reeves BC, Wells G, Thuku M, Hamel C, Moran J, et al. AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both. BMJ. 2017;358:j4008.

Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Sterne JA, Hernn MA, Reeves BC, Savovi J, Berkman ND, Viswanathan M, et al. ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions. BMJ. 2016;355:i4919.

Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Hayden JA, van der Windt DA, Cartwright JL, Ct P, Bombardier C. Assessing bias in studies of prognostic factors. Ann Intern Med. 2013;158(4):2806.

Article PubMed Google Scholar

Wells GA, Shea B, OConnell D, Peterson J, Welch V, Losos M, et al. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomised studies in meta-analyses. Ottawa Hospital Research Institute; 2000. Available from: https://www.ohri.ca/programs/clinical_epidemiology/oxford.asp.

Smith V, Devane D, Begley CM, Clarke M. Methodology in conducting a systematic review of systematic reviews of healthcare interventions. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2011;11(1):16.

Article Google Scholar

Pieper D, Antoine S-L, Mathes T, Neugebauer EA, Eikermann M. Systematic review finds overlapping reviews were not mentioned in every other overview. J Clin Epidemiol. 2014;67(4):36875.

Article PubMed Google Scholar

Bougioukas KI, Liakos A, Tsapas A, Ntzani E, Haidich A-B. Preferred reporting items for overviews of systematic reviews including harms checklist: a pilot tool to be used for balanced reporting of benefits and harms. J Clin Epidemiol. 2018;93:924.

Article PubMed Google Scholar

Okoth K, Chandan JS, Marshall T, Thangaratinam S, Thomas GN, Nirantharakumar K, et al. Association between the reproductive health of young women and cardiovascular disease in later life: umbrella review. BMJ. 2020;371:m3502.

Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Pollock M, Fernandes RM, Newton AS, Scott SD, Hartling L. A decision tool to help researchers make decisions about including systematic reviews in overviews of reviews of healthcare interventions. Syst Rev. 2019;8(1):18.

Article Google Scholar

Pollock M, Fernandes RM, Newton AS, Scott SD, Hartling L. The impact of different inclusion decisions on the comprehensiveness and complexity of overviews of reviews of healthcare interventions. Syst Rev. 2019;8(1):114.

Article Google Scholar

Fusar-Poli P, Radua J. Ten simple rules for conducting umbrella reviews. BMJ Ment Health. 2018;21(3):95100.

Google Scholar

DerSimonian R, Laird N. Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials. 1986;7(3):17788.

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Lau J, Ioannidis JP, Schmid CH. Quantitative synthesis in systematic reviews. Ann Intern Med. 1997;127(9):8206.

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Higgins JP, Thompson SG. Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Stat Med. 2002;21(11):153958.

Article PubMed Google Scholar

Riley RD, Higgins JP, Deeks JJ. Interpretation of random effects meta-analyses. BMJ. 2011;342:d549.

Article PubMed Google Scholar

Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Spiegelhalter DJ. A re-evaluation of random-effects meta-analysis. J R Stat Soc A Stat Soc. 2009;172(1):13759.

Article MathSciNet Google Scholar

Egger M, Smith GD, Schneider M, Minder C. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ. 1997;315(7109):62934.

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Higgins JP, Thomas J, Chandler J, Cumpston M, Li T, Page MJ, et al. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Chichester: Wiley; 2019.

R Core Team. R: a language and environment for statistical computing; 2022. Available from: https://www.R-project.org/.

RStudio Team. RStudio: integrated development environment for R; 2022. Available from: http://www.rstudio.com/.

Balduzzi S, Rcker G, Schwarzer G. How to perform a meta-analysis with R: a practical tutorial. BMJ Ment Health. 2019;22(4):15360.

Google Scholar

Bundhun PK, Soogund MZS, Huang F. Impact of systemic lupus erythematosus on maternal and fetal outcomes following pregnancy: a meta-analysis of studies published between years 20012016. J Autoimmun. 2017;79:1727.

Article PubMed Google Scholar

Di Cianni G, Ghio A, Resi V, Volpe L. Gestational diabetes mellitus: an opportunity to prevent type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease in young women. Womens Health. 2010;6(1):97105.

Google Scholar

Edstedt Bonamy AK, Parikh NI. Predicting womens future cardiovascular health from pregnancy complications. Curr Cardiovasc Risk Rep. 2013;7(3):17382.

Article Google Scholar

Gortner L. Intrauterine growth restriction and risk for arterial hypertension: a causal relationship? J Perinat Med. 2007;35(5):3615.

Article PubMed Google Scholar

Guo J, Chen J-L, Whittemore R, Whitaker E. Postpartum lifestyle interventions to prevent type 2 diabetes among women with history of gestational diabetes: a systematic review of randomized clinical trials. J Womens Health (2002). 2016;25(1):3849.

Article Google Scholar

Hutchesson M, Campbell L, Leonard A, Vincze L, Shrewsbury V, Collins C, et al. Do modifiable risk factors for cardiovascular disease post-pregnancy influence the association between hypertensive disorders of pregnancy and cardiovascular health outcomes? A systematic review of observational studies. Pregnancy Hypertens. 2022;27:13847.

Excerpt from:
Association between pregnancy-related complications and development of type 2 diabetes and hypertension in women ... - BMC Medicine