Role of markers of inflammation and endothelial dysfunction in the prognosis of the development of cardiovascular complications in patients with…

Posted: Published on November 9th, 2020

This post was added by Alex Diaz-Granados

This article was originally published here

Kardiologiia. 2020 Sep 17;60(8):98-105. doi: 10.18087/cardio.2020.8.n966.

ABSTRACT

Aim To study the role of inflammation markers and endothelial dysfunction in predicting the risk of cardiovascular event following a percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with ischemic heart disease (IHD) and metabolic syndrome (MS).Materials and methods 80 patients (72 men; median age, 56 (50;63) years) with IHD and PCI were evaluated. Based on the presence of MS according to NCEP-ATP III criteria, patients were divided into two groups, group 1 without MS (n=32) and group 2 with MS (n=48). The control age- and sex-matched group included 15 people without cardiovascular diseases. Serum concentrations of tumor necrosis factor (TNF), interleukin 6 (IL-6), IL-10, lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2 (LP-PLA2), and endothelin 1 were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Patients were followed up for 12 months after PCI with evaluation of the incidence of adverse cardiovascular events. Statistical analysis was performed with Statistica 10.0 and Medcalc 19.2.6 software. Differences between variables were considered statistically significant at <0.05. Potential predictors were determined by the ROC analysis with construction of ROC curves, calculation of AUC (area under the curve), identification of COP (cut-off point by the Youdens index), and sensitivity (Se) and specificity corresponding to the COP.Results Patients with MS had statistically significantly higher serum levels of inflammatory markers than patients of the control group. Concentration of the intravascular inflammation marker, PL-PLA2, was 2.7 times higher in group 1 and 5.1 times higher in group 2 than in the control group (<0.001). Concentrations of endothelin 1 were 1.9 times higher in group 1 and 3.7 times higher in the MS group compared to the control. At one year after PCI, the incidence of adverse outcomes in the form of cardiovascular events was higher for patients with MS: 10 (20.8 %) cases of stent restenosis and 13 (27.1 %) episodes of coronary atherosclerosis progression according to results of repeated coronarography vs. 2 (6.3%) restenosis cases (2-10.853; =0.002) and 2 (6.3%) episodes of atherosclerosis progression (2-23.651; =0.001) for patients without MS. The groups did not differ in rates of myocardial infarction and cardiac death. The most significant predictors of unfavorable prognosis were LP-PLA2 concentration >983.83 ng/ml (area under the ROC curve, 0.867; sensitivity, 80 %; specificity, 100%; <0.001) and endothelin 1 overexpression >0.852 fmol/ml (area under the ROC curve, 0.885; sensitivity, 85.5 %; specificity, 83.6 %; <0.001).Conclusion Patients with MS were characterized by more pronounced imbalance of pro- and anti-inflammatory factors. Concentrations of LP-PLA2 >983.83 ng/ml and endothelin 1 >0.852 fmol/ml were shown to be predictors of unfavorable prognosis for patients with IHD and MS after PCI with coronary stenting.

PMID:33155965 | DOI:10.18087/cardio.2020.8.n966

Read the rest here:
Role of markers of inflammation and endothelial dysfunction in the prognosis of the development of cardiovascular complications in patients with...

Related Posts
This entry was posted in Coronary Heart Diseases. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.