To read Hard Cell by Mayrav Saar (PostScript, Feb. 26), one would think the only form of stem-cell therapy is the embryo-destroying kind. There wasnt a single mention of non-embryonic adult stem cells.
One attraction of embryonic versus non-embryonic research for some is political the chance to stick it to pro-lifers. But it grieves me to see ailing people used as pawns in this culture war and being denied the possible benefits of adult stem-cell research.
Flushing such an idea down the memory hole, as you help do with this article, is against the spirit of scientific inquiry.
Bob Hunt, Hillsborough, NJ
Wrong on the right
If social conservatives had won out in history, women would not be able to vote and we would still have slavery (Why Social Issues Matter, Jeffrey Bell, PostScript, Feb. 26).
Their thinking denigrates the role of science and promotes antiquated religious beliefs. Many of the causes taken up by social conservatives have been seen to be wrong in light of later progressive thought.
While social conservatives say some good things, history has shown that their views work against American freedoms an obscurantism that continues today.
Jeffrey Bell should balance his thought with facts and not be led blindly by evangelicals.
Eduardo Rodriguez, Corona
View original post here:
Stem-cell pawns