Subthalamic nucleus versus globus pallidus bilateral deep brain stimulation for advanced Parkinson ‘s disease (NSTAPS …

Posted: Published on November 16th, 2012

This post was added by Dr Simmons

We recruited patients from five centres in the Netherlands who were aged 18 years or older, had idiopathic Parkinson's disease, and had, despite optimum pharmacological treatment, at least one of the following symptoms: severe response fluctuations, dyskinesias, painful dystonias, or bradykinesia. By use of a computer-generated randomisation sequence, we randomly assigned patients to receive either GPi DBS or STN DBS (1:1), applying a minimisation procedure according to drug use (levodopa equivalent dose vs 1000 mg) and treatment centre. Patients and study assessors (but not those who assessed adverse events) were masked to treatment allocation. We had two primary outcomes: functional health as measured by the weighted Academic Medical Center Linear Disability Scale (ALDS; weighted by time spent in the off phase and on phase) and a composite score for cognitive, mood, and behavioural effects up to 1 year after surgery. Secondary outcomes were symptom scales, activities of daily living scales, a quality-of-life questionnaire, the occurrence of adverse events, and drug use. We used the intention-to-treat principle for all analyses. This trial is registered with http://www.controlled-trials.com, number ISRCTN85542074.

Follow this link:
Subthalamic nucleus versus globus pallidus bilateral deep brain stimulation for advanced Parkinson 's disease (NSTAPS ...

Related Posts
This entry was posted in Parkinson's Treatment. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.