Work Productivity Outcomes Associated with Ocrelizumab Compared with Other Disease-Modifying Therapies for Multiple Sclerosis – DocWire News

Posted: Published on November 28th, 2020

This post was added by Alex Diaz-Granados

This article was originally published here

Neurol Ther. 2020 Nov 26. doi: 10.1007/s40120-020-00224-1. Online ahead of print.

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated work and activity impairment in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) treated with ocrelizumab (OCR) versus other disease-modifying therapies (DMTs).

METHODS: Data were obtained from the Adelphi Real World Disease Specific Programme for Multiple Sclerosis. Patients with relapsing-remitting or secondary progressive MS who completed surveys in 2018 and 2019 and received 6 months of an eligible therapy, including OCR, injectable therapy, and oral therapy, were included. Outcomes were assessed using the patient-reported Work Productivity and Activity Impairment questionnaire. Doubly robust estimation, which combined propensity score weighting and regression modeling, was used to compare treatments, controlling for baseline clinical and demographic characteristics.

RESULTS: This study included 630 patients (OCR, n = 90; injectable DMT, n = 224; oral DMT, n = 316) with a mean (standard deviation) age of 42 (11) years. A greater proportion of OCR-treated patients had an Expanded Disability Status Scale score of 3 at treatment initiation compared with those receiving oral and injectable DMTs (51 vs. 15% and 15%, respectively), and a smaller proportion of OCR-treated patients received treatment for 1 year (43 vs. 90% and 92%, respectively). OCR-treated patients had higher odds of employment [odds ratio (95% confidence interval) 3.4 (1.5-7.7) vs. oral DMT, 5.6 (2.6-12.0) vs. injectable DMT], lower overall work productivity loss [difference (95% confidence interval) 10.0% (- 6.1 to 15.0%) vs. oral DMT, 13.0% (- 8.5 to 17.0%) vs. injectable DMT] and lower activity impairment [difference (95% confidence interval) 11% (- 7.1 to 16.0%) vs. oral DMT, 9.7% (- 5.0 to 14.0%) vs. injectable DMT].

CONCLUSION: This real-world evidence suggests that patients with MS treated with OCR experience lower work and activity impairment than patients treated with other DMTs.

PMID:33244713 | DOI:10.1007/s40120-020-00224-1

Original post:
Work Productivity Outcomes Associated with Ocrelizumab Compared with Other Disease-Modifying Therapies for Multiple Sclerosis - DocWire News

Related Posts
This entry was posted in MS Treatment. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.